A:
nommal
1. Gov.
293
2
19.4.39
(Deo. petition from Haw la Bess. Atcomery)
Even if this appeal
하
Lad been made to
The Supreme Cont
it would have
been out of time.
NYSA.
These documents should be read in the
following order: First the enclosures to the
petition, then enclosure 3 to the despatch, then
enclosure 1 to the despatch (i.e. the petition), then
enclosure 4 to the despatch.
The history of the case is briefly as
follows: the rateable value of the premises in
question for the period 1.7.38 to 30.6.39 was at
first fixed at $4,800 because the factory was being
used as a go-down to house the idle machinery of a
Company which had previously gone into liquidation.
In November an interim assessment was made and the
rateable value for the same period was raised to
pist $21,800, with effect from November 1st, because
of the change to a normal usage of the buildings,
second, because of improvements that had been carried
out and thirdly because of the higher rents obtaining
following the outbreak of hostilities in South China.
By not returning the Government form within the
prescribed time Messrs. Haw Par Bros. forfeited the right to appeal against the assessment, consequently
Mr. Ip appealed to the Governor in Council.
informed that the matter was not one in which an
He was
appeal lay to the Governor and that the correct
machinery for the redress of any legitimate grievance was to appeal to the Supreme Court in its Summary
Jurisdiction
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.